Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Alberta Education. (2005).Safety in the Science Classroom. AB: Auteur.

Brophy, J. & Alleman, J. (1991). A Caveat: Curriculum Integration Isn't Always a Good Idea. Educational Leadership, 49, 66.

Conseil canadien sur l'apprentissage. (2007).Redéfinir le mode d'évaluation de l'apprentissage chez le Autochtones. Rapport sur l'apprentissage au Canada 2007. Ottawa, ON: Auteur. http://www.ccl‐cca.ca/CCL/Reports/RedefiningSuccessInAboriginalLearning/RedefiningSuccessModels‐2.html.

Conseil international pour la science. (2002). ICSU Series on Science for Sustainable Development No 4: Science, traditional knowledge and sustainable development. Paris, France: Auteur.Iscu.org/publications/reports_and_reviews/science_traditional_knowledge/science_traditional_knowledge.pdf.(Site consulté le 7 décembre 2014).

Conseil des ministres de l'Éducation, Canada. (2008).Cadre commun des résultats d'apprentissage ensciences de la nature.Disponible en ligne à http://publications.cmec.ca/science/framework/index.htm.

Conseil des ministres de l'Éducation, Canada. (1997).Cadre commun pancanadien des résultats d'apprentissage aux sciences M à 12.Toronto, ON : Auteur.

Copple, C. & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009).Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth Through Age 8 (3rd ed.).Washington, DC: National Association forthe Education of Young Children.

Di Giuseppe, M. (Ed). (2007). Science education: A summary of research, theories, and practice: A Canadian perspective.Toronto, ON: Thomson Nelson.

Education Review Office. (1996).Science in Schools ‐ Implementing the 1995 Science Curriculum (5). Wellington: Crown Copyright.

Flick, L. & Bell, R. (2000).Preparing tomorrow's science teachers to use technology: Guidelines for science educators.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1, 39‐60.

International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: National Science Foundation.

Kluger‐Bell, B. (2000). Recognizing inquiry: Comparing three hands‐on teaching techniques. In Inquiry‐Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K‐5 Classroom (Foundations ‐ A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics and technology education. Vol. 2). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Kwan, T. & Texley, J. (2003).Inquiring Safely: A Guide for Middle School Teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Ministère de l'Éducation de la Saskatchewan. (2009).Tronc commun : Principes, répartition de temps et allocation des crédits pour les écoles fransaskoises.Regina : Ministère de l'Éducation de la Saskatchewan. Disponible en ligne à http://educa먔on.gov.sk.ca/tronc‐commun‐pour‐les‐ecoles‐fransaskoises (Site consulté le 7 février 2013).

National Research Council. (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2006).America's lab report: Investigations in high school science.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (1999).NSTA position statement: Science competitions.Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/competitions.aspx.

National Science Teachers Association. (1999).NSTA position statement: The integral role of laboratory investigations in science instruction.Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx.

National Science Teachers Association. (1999).NSTA position statement: Responsible use of live animals and dissection in the science classroom.Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/animals.aspx