Aikenhead, G. S. (2006).Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-Based Practice.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Alberta Education. (2005).Safety in the Science Classroom.AB: Auteur.

Brophy, J. & Alleman, J. (1991). A Caveat: Curriculum Integration Isn’t Always a Good Idea. Educational Leadership, 49, 66.

Conseil canadien sur l’apprentissage. (2007).Redéfinir le mode d’évaluation de l’apprentissage chez le Autochtones. Rapport sur l’apprentissage au Canada 2007.Ottawa, ON: Auteur. http://www.ccl-cca.ca/CCL/Reports/RedefiningSuccessInAboriginalLearning/RedefiningSuccessModels-2.html (Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).

Conseil international pour la science. (2002).ICSU Series on Science for Sustainable Development No 4: Science, traditional knowledge and sustainable development.Paris, France: Auteur. Iscu.org/publications/reports_and_reviews/science_traditional_knowledge/science_traditional_knowledge.pdf (Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).

Conseil des ministres de l’Éducation, Canada. (2008). Cadre commun des résultats d’apprentissage en sciences de la nature.Disponible en ligne à http://science.cmec.ca/index.fr.htm (Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).

Conseil des ministres de l’Éducation, Canada. (1997). Cadre commun pancanadien des résultats d’apprentissage aux sciences M à 12.Toronto, ON: Auteur.

Copple, C. & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth Through Age 8 (3rd ed.).Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Di Giuseppe, M. (Ed). (2007).Science Education: A Summary of Research, Theories, and practice: A Canadian Perspective.Toronto, ON: Thomson Nelson.

Education Review Office. (1996).Science in Schools – Implementing the 1995 Science Curriculum(5).Wellington: Crown Copyright.

Flick, L. & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing Tomorrow’s Science Teachers to Use Technology: Guidelines for Science Educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1, 39-60.

International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology.Reston, VA: National Science Foundation.

Kluger-Bell, B. (2000). Recognizing inquiry: Comparing three hands-on teaching techniques.In Inquiry – Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5 Classroom (Foundations - A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics and technology education. Vol. 2).Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Kwan, T. & Texley, J. (2003). Inquiring Safely: A Guide for Middle School Teachers.Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Ministère de l’Éducation de la Saskatchewan. (2009).Tronc commun: Principes, répartition de temps et allocation des crédits pour les écoles fransaskoises. Regina : Ministère de l’Éducation de la Saskatchewan. Disponible en ligne à http://education.gov.sk.ca/tronc-commun-pour-les-ecoles-fransaskoises(Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for Teaching and Learning.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2006). America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). 2007. NSTA Position Statement: The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction.Disponible en ligne à http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx. (Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). 2008.NSTA Position Statement: Responsible Use of Live Animals and Dissection in the Science Classroom.Disponible en ligne à http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/animals.aspx. (Site consulté le 13 septembre 2016).